 |
View Old Forum Thread
Buzzz
March 12, 2015 at 03:28PM View BBCode
Guess you caught the league in a discussion but there freindly for the most part, even Nuzzy. Welcome NumberMan
num014
Young Major Leaguer 10%
Late Bloomer 10%
Enigma 1 3%
Enigma 2 3%
Enigma 3 3%
Ageless Wonder 10%
Bust 9%
Gem 10%
Bust in Minors/Gem in Majors 10%
Gem in Minors/Bust in Majors 10%
Eureka 1 3%
Eureka 2 3%
Eureka 3 3%
Retire at 28 1%
Retire at 30 1%
Retire at 32 1%
[Edited on 3-13-2015 by num014]
March 13, 2015 at 04:39AM View BBCode
Thank you. These days I busy signing free agents in two salary League.I do not like tanking ... but I like Development Curve System and speedyMaybe we can change the VD ratios to prevent tanking like this Regular 10%Young Major Leaguer 10%
Late Bloomer 10%
Enigma 1 3%
Enigma 2 3%
Enigma 3 3%
Ageless Wonder 10%
Bust 9%
Gem 10%
Bust in Minors/Gem in Majors 10%
Gem in Minors/Bust in Majors 10%
Eureka 1 3%
Eureka 2 3%
Eureka 3 3%
Retire at 28 1%
Retire at 30 1%
Retire at 32 1%
[Edited on 3-13-2015 by num014]
MrEd
March 13, 2015 at 06:27AM View BBCode
Welome! It's a very competitive League so enjoy yourself.
Buzzz
NumMan, not familar with this stratagy. What leagues are doing this? Maybe played in one and didn't know it.
Could you explain impact doing your recommendation..
March 13, 2015 at 03:57PM View BBCode
Originally posted by num014 ... but I like Development Curve System and speedyMaybe we can change the VD ratios to prevent tanking like this Regular 10%
[Edited on 3-13-2015 by num014]
NumMan, not familar with this stratagy. What leagues are doing this? Maybe played in one and didn't know it.
Could you explain impact doing your recommendation..
nuzzy62
I don't think we use the early retire because it was set-up after we started.
If we leave those three at 1% (retire at 28, 30, 32) we could do the other 14 at 7% each (7x14 =98) and could subtract the extra 1% from a category. I'd recommend either bust or minor league bust (because that's basically a bust).
It would create more unpredictability in the draft picks, thus, having the number 1 pick is any guarantee of getting the best player in the draft.
March 13, 2015 at 05:00PM View BBCode
There are 17 curves...I don't think we use the early retire because it was set-up after we started.
If we leave those three at 1% (retire at 28, 30, 32) we could do the other 14 at 7% each (7x14 =98) and could subtract the extra 1% from a category. I'd recommend either bust or minor league bust (because that's basically a bust).
It would create more unpredictability in the draft picks, thus, having the number 1 pick is any guarantee of getting the best player in the draft.
num014
March 13, 2015 at 05:29PM View BBCode
Originally posted by nuzzy62thanks nuzzy62.That is what I mean
There are 17 curves...
I don't think we use the early retire because it was set-up after we started.
If we leave those three at 1% (retire at 28, 30, 32) we could do the other 14 at 7% each (7x14 =98) and could subtract the extra 1% from a category. I'd recommend either bust or minor league bust (because that's basically a bust).
It would create more unpredictability in the draft picks, thus, having the number 1 pick is any guarantee of getting the best player in the draft.
Buzzz
Not sure this would hinder tanking since it be so random.
March 13, 2015 at 06:52PM View BBCode
Doesn't seem like the desired affect we want, to me this recommendation increases the chance for failure, don't we want increase success since were at the bottom of the Improve/foreign talent level. Wouldn't we want to increase our Improves and draft talent?Not sure this would hinder tanking since it be so random.
Pages: 1