Sim Dynasty

View Old Forum Thread

Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » Goose gets in
bobcat73

Goose gets in

January 09, 2008 at 07:14AM View BBCode

[url=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/baseball/mlb/01/08/hall.2008.ap/index.html]link to HoF results[/url]

So Goose got in but Rice is still just a couple short.

I was suprised to see Big Mac not lose ground this vote.
nbn_ckh3

January 09, 2008 at 08:41AM View BBCode

Good news about Goose.

Best thing to come out of Colorado Springs... sports related... along with Rick Barry.
Benne

January 09, 2008 at 10:42AM View BBCode

No Blyleven. No Raines. Another year of HOF censored .
DougB

January 09, 2008 at 02:16PM View BBCode

the last great year Tim Raines had was at age 27. I realize he's considered a poor man's Rickey Henderson. But he just didn't do enough after age 27 to get it. He'll never make it. If he did we'd have to hear from supporters of nice but not great players like Brett Butler and Kenny Loften.

I like Blyleven a bit more but I probably would not vote for him. He's not any better than Jim Kaat or Tommy John. I'm not sure guys like that should be in the hall. I'm sure we all respect Mike Mussina's career but I sure would not put him in the hall of fame.

Boy the 1980's sure suffers from a lot of fringe candidates. Dale Murphy, Andre Dawson, Jim Rice, Bert Blyleven, Tommy John, Jack Morris, Don Mattingly... all had great careers but there is a solid argument against each one. Heck I probably would not have voted for Gossage. A guy who has 7 very good seasons and 10 mediocre seasons is hard to vote for. If they get 3,000 hits and 2 MVP's like Robin Yount they get in. But a relief pitcher? I'm not sure Goose was much better than Kent Tekulve and Sparky Lyle.

[Edited on 1-9-2008 by DougB]
FuriousGiorge

January 09, 2008 at 03:33PM View BBCode

Here are some of the on-base percentages Rock posted after the age of 27: .395, .380, .401, .374, .383, .403, .395 (the last three in limited playing time). In 1993, at the age of 33, he posted a line of .306/.401/.480 in 415 at-bats. That would seem to count, for most players, as a great year. His career on-base percentage was only matched by Hall of Famer Lou Brock in a season one time. His career line of .294/.385/.425 compares favorably to Rod Carew's .328/.393/.429, and he stole more bases and was caught fewer times. If Tim Raines doesn't get into the Hall of Fame, then the Hall of Fame simply doesn't care to allow leadoff men in, because Raines was unquestionably one of the best.
Cubsfan13

January 09, 2008 at 09:23PM View BBCode

You're censored dreamy, Furious. You too, Benne.

I was amazed by how nobody even seemed to be talking about Raines. 24%, or whatever he got, is a joke.
DwightKSchrute

January 09, 2008 at 09:43PM View BBCode

Alan Trammell is my snub. Compare him with Ozzie Smith (who is in):

Tram:

2365 Hits, 185 HRs, 1003 RBis, 1231 Runs, 236 SBs, .285 AVG
1984 WS MVP
4 Gold Gloves

Oz:

2460 Hits, 28 HRs, 793 RBis, 1257 Runs, 580 SBa, .262 AVG
1985 NLCS MVP
13 Gold Gloves

Now the only two numbers that stand out for Oz are his Stolen Bases and his Gold Gloves. Trammell clearly played Gold Glove defense but he played in a league with Cal Ripken and Robin Yount so he didn't win the award as many times as he would have in different circumstances. Now to the stolen bases, I would submit that a stolen base is only worth something when it allows you to score a run you otherwise would not have. Trammell's lower number of stolen bases clearly didn't prevent him from crossing home plate almost as often as Ozzie did.

So what keeps Ozzie in and Trammell out? Is it that Trammell quietly went out on the field and did his job while Ozzie did back flips? That's the only reason I can find and I find it a clear shame to keep Trammell out. Take nothing away from Ozzie. He was indeed excellent.
barterer2002

January 09, 2008 at 10:10PM View BBCode

Ozzie Smith had a career range factor of 5.03 at a time when the league average was 4.10.

By comparison Trammell posted a 4.47 range factor at a time when the league average was 4.09.

Essentially what this means is that Ozzie made one extra play every game while Trammell made an extra play every other game. Its a little more than just doing back flips.
mr1313

January 09, 2008 at 10:20PM View BBCode

Still a guy like Ozzie Smith would have a damn hard time getting into the hall these days, and in the future, how many times do you see players getting in on defense alone. 1313
barterer2002

January 10, 2008 at 12:09AM View BBCode

Including Ozzie and not including catchers I'd say two. Ozzie and Bill Mazerowski
DwightKSchrute

January 10, 2008 at 01:46AM View BBCode

Originally posted by barterer2002
Ozzie Smith had a career range factor of 5.03 at a time when the league average was 4.10.

By comparison Trammell posted a 4.47 range factor at a time when the league average was 4.09.

Essentially what this means is that Ozzie made one extra play every game while Trammell made an extra play every other game. Its a little more than just doing back flips.


Good info, would you say that Ozzie belongs and Trammell doesn't?
whiskybear

January 10, 2008 at 02:00AM View BBCode

Originally posted by mr1313
Still a guy like Ozzie Smith would have a damn hard time getting into the hall these days, and in the future, how many times do you see players getting in on defense alone. 1313


Ozzie Smith was elected to the Hall in 2002.

[Edited on 1-10-2008 by whiskybear]
BobbyGrich

January 10, 2008 at 02:38AM View BBCode

Yes, do not badmouth the Wizard. He was a stud on defense, far more than a circus act who did backflips. His defense was amazing. He could have been worse on offense and still deserved a spot in the hall.
I also like the Hawk, Andre Dawson. He is a member of the elite 400HR, 300 SB club, MVP in 87, he was a top performer during his era.
FuriousGiorge

January 10, 2008 at 02:42AM View BBCode

He's not a Hall of Famer.
bobcat73

January 10, 2008 at 02:48AM View BBCode

Dawson should get in.
mr1313

January 10, 2008 at 02:49AM View BBCode

Ozzie's flashiness made us believe he was better then he really was. 1313
BobbyGrich

January 10, 2008 at 02:52AM View BBCode

thank you bobcat, and what do you mean 1313? Bart posted numbers that show Ozzie was superior.
mr1313

January 10, 2008 at 02:52AM View BBCode

Chirist if you let a .262 lifetime hitter with an obp of .337 get in the hall, Rice and the Hawk should be autofuckingmatic. 1313
BobbyGrich

January 10, 2008 at 02:54AM View BBCode

I agree, Rice and Hawk should be in
mr1313

January 10, 2008 at 02:55AM View BBCode

bart can throw all the numbers he want at me, you can make any numbers say what you want, the botton line is lifetime avg. .262 lifetime obp .337.
BobbyGrich

January 10, 2008 at 02:56AM View BBCode

I know a lot of you guys are college kids, did you see Ozzie play? You discount Bart's numbers, then post your own???

[Edited on 1-10-2008 by BobbyGrich]
FuriousGiorge

January 10, 2008 at 03:06AM View BBCode

Originally posted by mr1313
Chirist if you let a .262 lifetime hitter with an obp of .337 get in the hall, Rice and the Hawk should be autofuckingmatic. 1313


That's....retarded.
mr1313

January 10, 2008 at 03:17AM View BBCode

What that Rice and Dawson should get in? 1313
FuriousGiorge

January 10, 2008 at 03:20AM View BBCode

No, that you're comparing the hitting numbers of a shortstop inducted mostly for his glove with two left fielders.
rkinslow19

January 10, 2008 at 03:36AM View formatted

You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
[quote][i]Originally posted by mr1313[/i]
Still a guy like Ozzie Smith would have a damn hard time getting into the hall these days, and in the future, how many times do you see players getting in on defense alone. 1313 [/quote]

Omar Vizquel?

11 gold gloves, highest fielding percentage at SS ever.

But career hitting stats are meager: .274, 77 HR, 2598 H, 280 SB

Pages: 1 2